Quick Verdict
In my opinion, Tim Sykes is the original blueprint for the modern trading guru — and the most instructive case study of why you should never trust a marketed track record you cannot independently verify. His entire brand rests on one story: that he turned roughly $12,000 of bar mitzvah money into more than a million dollars as a teenager. In twenty years of selling that story, I have never seen a single audited, third-party brokerage statement that proves it. Not one.
What I have seen is the opposite. When Sykes raised money for a real hedge fund — where sophisticated investors actually check the numbers — the publicly filed SEC paperwork tells a very different story than his marketing. He has admitted, in his own words to a major news outlet, that he is "not a very good investor." And the platform he points to as "proof" of his trading, Profit.ly, is a site he owns himself, where users can edit and delete their own entries. In my opinion, that is not verification. That is grading your own homework and calling it an audit.
This review walks through nine specific reasons, backed by court records, an SEC filing, his own public statements, and a sales call I recorded, that lead me to believe prospective students should be extremely cautious before paying Sykes anything. As always, the conclusions about his marketing are my opinion; the documents and quotes speak for themselves.
Get the Complete Framework — Free Get $400+ of free options trading training and the Trader's Edge cheat sheet. Win up to 98% of your trades in 10 minutes a day. Join 127+ five-star verified reviewers. No credit card required.
Key Takeaways
- The foundation of Sykes's entire brand — the $12,000-to-$1 million teenage trading story — has, in my opinion, never been supported by a single independent, audited brokerage statement in over two decades of telling it.
- When Sykes launched a real hedge fund, Cilantro Fund Partners, the SEC Form D he filed in August 2003 shows he offered $100 million but raised only $257,284 — from just four accredited investors.
- Sykes told Reuters in 2007, in a direct quote, that he is "not a very good investor."
- His Cilantro fund, by news accounts, collapsed in large part because he got trapped in an illiquid penny stock — the exact mistake he now charges students thousands of dollars to learn to avoid.
- A sales representative for Sykes, on a call I recorded, claimed an independent accounting firm had "verified" his returns; when I called that firm, they told me they had never heard of him.
- Profit.ly, the platform Sykes cites as proof, is a site he owns; entries can be self-imported, edited, and deleted, which in my opinion makes its "verified" badge meaningless.
- His celebrated "millionaire students" are, as far as I can find, self-reported, with no published independent broker statements; several early students later distanced themselves from him.
- Multiple online communities allege a pattern of buying low-float penny stocks before alerting subscribers — allegations Sykes denies, but which mirror conduct he has publicly criticized in others.
- His pricing ladder runs into the $12,000–$16,000 range per committed student, with complaints that the product is largely thousands of pre-recorded videos.
- StocksToTrade, the software company Sykes co-founded, was the subject of a 2020 federal trade-secrets lawsuit (Scanz Technologies v. JewMon) that settled out of court in 2021.
- A 2025 federal class action (Moses v. Millionaire Media) alleged aggressive text-message marketing in violation of the TCPA; it also settled.
- In my opinion, the more profitable and durable path is selling options premium on high-quality companies with documented, verifiable results — which is exactly what I do, with real E*TRADE statements published openly.
Tim Sykes in 2026: Status Update
Tim Sykes is, to be clear about what is not in dispute, a real person with a genuine two-decade public career. He appeared in the 2006 documentary series Wall Street Warriors, he has been featured on CNBC, and he authored the book An American Hedge Fund. None of that is in question, and I want this review to be fair on the facts that are verifiable.
As of 2026, his business empire operates primarily through Millionaire Media and Millionaire Publishing, his personal site at timothysykes.com, and StocksToTrade — the charting and scanning software he co-founded in 2012 with Zak Westphal, who serves as its current CEO. Sykes remains a co-founder and the brand's public face; Tim Bohen is promoted as its lead trainer. A Forbes contributor has estimated that Sykes earned as much as $20 million from subscriptions in 2015 alone, which is the more telling number, because it points to where the money actually comes from.
His flagship offering remains the "Trading Challenge," a high-priced program that, by numerous recent accounts, is quoted to prospective students in the $12,000–$16,000 range. The marketing language has evolved over the years, but the core promise has not changed since 2007: that he can teach you to do what he says he did as a teenager. The problem, in my opinion, is that the original feat has never been proven, and recent developments have only added to the questions.
Watch the Full Investigation
Before you read through the evidence below, I'd encourage you to watch the two investigations I've put together. The first is the one I'd start with: I recorded a sales call with one of Sykes's representatives, and what the rep said about his "verified" returns — and then admitted when I pushed back — speaks for itself. The second is my comprehensive walkthrough of the Cilantro fund, the audit claims, and the Profit.ly problem.
9 Reasons Why Tim Sykes May Not Be Legitimate
1) The $12,000-to-$1 Million Story Has No Verifiable Proof — Anywhere
Every guru needs an origin myth, and this is Sykes's: that he took roughly $12,000 in bar mitzvah gift money and turned it into more than $1.65 million while still in school. It is the single claim on which his entire teaching business is built, because the implicit pitch is, "I did it, so I can teach you to do it."
Here is what bothers me. He has been telling this story publicly for roughly twenty years. Outlets like Reuters and BusinessWeek have reported the claim — meaning they repeated what he told them — but reporting a claim is not the same as verifying it. In two decades, I have not been able to find a single audited, independent, broker-issued statement that documents that teenage run from start to finish. For a man who has filed SEC paperwork, run a hedge fund, and built a media empire, the absence of the one document that would settle the question is, in my opinion, deafening.
There is also a basic math problem that his own draft of the story creates. If a teenager genuinely compounded that kind of money at the rates he implies and kept trading actively for two decades, the resulting fortune would be measured in the tens of millions from trading alone — by some reasonable estimates north of $80 million — not the modest figure his fund filings and net-worth estimates suggest. The numbers do not reconcile with the legend. In my opinion, $1 million was chosen precisely because it is the most relatable, marketable number in finance: big enough to impress a beginner, small enough to feel achievable. That is a marketing decision, not an audited result.
2) The Cilantro Fund Math Contradicts His Own Millionaire Story
This is the document I consider the smoking gun, and it is public.
In August 2003, Sykes filed a Form D with the SEC for Cilantro Fund Partners LP, the hedge fund he launched. A Form D is the notice a fund files when it sells securities in a private offering. On that filing, Cilantro offered up to $100 million. The amount it actually sold was $257,284, from just four accredited investors. The filing lists Sykes as manager of the general partner and even itemizes a legal-fees line of $6,500 — these are not my numbers, they are his own regulatory disclosure.
Sit with the contradiction. If Sykes truly had $1.65 million of his own money from his teenage trading, why would he launch a hedge fund capitalized with barely a quarter of a million dollars? And if his returns were as spectacular as the marketing claims, why could he attract only four outside investors and a quarter-million dollars when sophisticated money was on the table? The most plausible explanation, in my opinion, is the simplest one: when he was in a setting where investors actually scrutinize a track record, he could not prove the returns that work so well in a YouTube ad. In my video investigation I also detail reporting that part of even that small sum was borrowed.
The contemporaneous reporting deepens the contradiction. In an April 2006 New York Times DealBook piece pointedly titled "30 Percent? That's Chutzpah, Even For a Hedge Fund," Cilantro is described as a roughly $3 million fund that had just cut its performance fee from an aggressive 30% down to 20%. The same coverage recounts Sykes's own telling that he started the fund with about $100,000 from his parents plus around $900,000 of his own money — and reports annual returns in the range of roughly 15% to 24% across 2003 through 2005. Those are respectable but thoroughly ordinary numbers; they are not the returns of a teenage trading prodigy who supposedly 100x'd his money. Even back in 2006, commenters on that piece openly questioned the origin story. The skepticism is not new, and it has only aged worse.
A hedge fund is the one arena where the verification a guru avoids becomes unavoidable. The numbers he was willing to put his name to in a federal filing — and the mediocre returns documented while the fund actually operated — are, in my opinion, the real numbers, and they do not match the legend.
3) By His Own 2007 Admission, He Wasn't a Good Investor
I don't have to characterize Sykes's trading ability, because he characterized it himself. In a Reuters article published November 1, 2007, titled "Failed hedge fund manager tries again on Internet," Sykes is quoted saying plainly that he is "not a very good investor." That is not my spin; it is his own admission, on the record, to a major wire service.
The same reporting describes how the Cilantro fund unraveled. By those accounts, the fund got trapped in an illiquid, low-priced stock — Cygnus E Transactions, which the article notes had collapsed to around seven cents — and could not get out cleanly. In other words, the man who now sells a program teaching people to avoid illiquid penny-stock traps reportedly blew up his own fund by walking straight into one. He also conceded, in the same period, that success took him years the first time and would likely take far longer the next — hardly the profile of the effortless trading prodigy the marketing sells.
When the founder of a trading-education empire is on record calling himself a poor investor and describing a fund failure caused by the exact error he now charges thousands to teach, I think prospective students deserve to weigh that against the highlight reel.
4) A Sales Call Caught on Tape: His Own Rep Misrepresented the Returns
This one I investigated personally, and I recorded it (see the first video above).
I went through Sykes's sales process as a prospective customer. On the call, the representative assured me that Sykes's trading results had been reviewed and verified by an independent accounting firm in Connecticut — the kind of statement that, if true, would answer every question in this review. So I did the obvious thing: I called the accounting firm they named. The people there told me they had never heard of Tim Sykes.
When I went back to the representative with that, the story changed. What had been described as an independent verification was, on closer questioning, a "compilation" — which, for anyone unfamiliar with accounting terminology, is the lowest level of involvement a CPA can have. In a compilation, the accountant simply assembles numbers the client provides; there is no testing, no auditing, and no verification of whether those numbers are real. The rep eventually conceded the figures were, in effect, self-imported — and then ended the call.
In my opinion, that exchange captures the entire business model in miniature: an impressive-sounding verification claim on the front end, and, when you scratch it, nothing underneath but numbers the company entered about itself.
5) Profit.ly Isn't Third-Party Verification — He Owns It
When you confront Sykes's defenders with the lack of audited statements, the response is almost always the same: "But his trades are verified on Profit.ly." This defense collapses the moment you ask one question — who owns Profit.ly?
Sykes does. Profit.ly is his own platform. The trades displayed there are, by multiple accounts including reporting from TradingSchools.org, self-imported, and entries on such platforms can be edited or deleted by the user. The "verified" badge, as I understand it, triggers more or less automatically on import — it is a label the platform applies to its own users' self-reported data, not a finding by an independent auditor who examined brokerage records.
Let me be blunt, because the situation deserves bluntness: a trader pointing to his own website, where he enters his own trades and his own software stamps them "verified," is not proof of anything. It is grading your own homework and then issuing yourself an A. The same pattern, by the way, has been documented around Investimonials.com, another Sykes-linked review property. In my opinion, "it's verified on Profit.ly" is the single most misleading sentence in this entire space, and it should be treated as a red flag, not a reassurance.
6) "Millionaire Students" Are Self-Reported Marketing, Not Documentation
A huge share of Sykes's marketing leans on his "millionaire students" — the handful of people he says got rich using his system. I want to be precise here, because this is where survivorship bias does its quiet damage.
As far as I can find, the claimed results of these students are self-reported, the same way Sykes's own are. I have not seen published, independent brokerage statements substantiating the headline figures. And notably, several of the original students most associated with his brand — names like Steven Dux and Tim Grittani — went on to build their own separate brands and businesses, putting visible distance between themselves and Sykes. When your best living advertisements start their own competing operations, that tells you something.
Even if a few students genuinely made money, the marketing never shows you the denominator: the thousands who paid and quietly lost. A program can truthfully showcase three winners while ninety-seven others blew up their accounts, and in my opinion, with a high-risk penny-stock strategy sold to beginners, the silent majority is exactly what you should worry about.
See the Strategy Live Real-time options alerts from a verified Wall Street trader with +78% multi-year returns. 14-day trial available.
Win Up to 98% of Your Trades
Follow My Trades with Real-Time Trade Alerts
7) The Pump-and-Dump and Front-Running Allegations
This reason comes with a clear label: these are allegations made by others, not findings I am presenting as fact. I include them because the pattern is alleged consistently enough, across enough independent communities, that prospective students should be aware of it and judge for themselves.
Across forums and communities such as r/StockMarket and r/Daytrading, users have alleged for years that Sykes effectively front-runs his own subscribers: that he takes positions in thinly traded, low-float penny stocks before alerting his large audience, then sells into the buying pressure his alerts create. With illiquid micro-cap stocks, a sudden wave of buyers can spike the price briefly — long enough, the allegation goes, for an early buyer to exit at a profit while latecomers are left holding the bag as it falls. Again, these are allegations; Sykes has not, to my knowledge, been found liable for this conduct.
What I find striking is the mirror. As even Wikipedia's entry on him notes, Sykes has publicly criticized celebrities like Shaquille O'Neal and Justin Bieber for promoting pump-and-dump schemes — while facing strikingly similar allegations about his own conduct. In my opinion, a person cannot credibly position himself as the watchdog of penny-stock manipulation while standing accused of the very behavior he condemns.
8) The Pricing Ladder Extracts $12,000–$16,000 Per Committed Student
Strip away the story and the software, and Sykes's business is, in my opinion, a high-ticket information-marketing funnel. It begins with cheap or free content to capture attention, then escalates through upsells toward the flagship "Trading Challenge," which numerous recent accounts — including Reddit threads from late 2024 — describe being quoted in the $12,000–$16,000 range.
What does a committed student actually receive for that money? Based on consumer complaints, the answer is sobering: large libraries of pre-recorded video — by some accounts thousands of videos — with limited genuine personal access to Sykes himself. Complaints filed with the Better Business Bureau, including cases referenced in federal court filings, describe figures like $12,000 and $4,500 paid for what amounted to recorded lessons. In my opinion, the sheer volume of content is not a feature but a mechanism: when a student fails after watching five thousand videos, the structure invites them to blame themselves for not absorbing it all, rather than questioning whether the underlying method was ever teachable or honestly represented.
Supporting this picture, a 2025 federal class action, Moses v. Millionaire Media, alleged that the company's marketing machine ignored opt-out requests, sent texts during prohibited quiet hours, and ran afoul of do-not-call rules under the TCPA — the kind of aggressive, high-volume outreach you'd expect from a business optimized to push expensive products. The amended complaint in that case also pointed to the marketing's reliance on eye-catching trading claims — including a roughly $7.9 million figure — used to draw prospects into the funnel toward the $12,000 Trading Challenge. The case settled in 2025. I include it not as a standalone verdict but as evidence of how hard the marketing engine pushes, and on what kind of unverified numbers it leans.
9) A Federal Trade-Secrets Lawsuit Over StocksToTrade
The software side of the empire has its own legal history. In 2020, Scanz Technologies filed a federal trade-secrets lawsuit, Scanz Technologies v. JewMon Enterprises and others (Southern District of Florida, case 1:20-cv-22957-RNS). The defendants included Sykes personally, Zak Westphal, Tim Bohen, and the StocksToTrade-related entities.
The core allegation was that, after terminating a software license with EquityFeed in April 2015, the defendants improperly used that scanning technology to build StocksToTrade. I want to be careful and fair here: the case did not produce a finding of liability. It was resolved through a Stipulation of Dismissal in August 2021, before Judge Robert N. Scola Jr. A settlement and dismissal is not an admission of wrongdoing, and I am not presenting it as one.
What I think it does establish, taken together with everything above, is a pattern worth noticing. When a single person and his companies accumulate a federal trade-secrets suit over their core software, a federal TCPA class action over their marketing, an SEC filing that contradicts the founding legend, and a recorded sales call misrepresenting verification — none individually a knockout, perhaps, but collectively a portrait — a careful consumer should, in my opinion, proceed with real skepticism.
Tim Sykes Net Worth: The Real Business Model
What's his actual net worth?
Estimates of Tim Sykes's net worth commonly land somewhere in the $20 million to $50 million range. I'll flag that as an estimate rather than a verified figure, because — fittingly for this review — there is no audited disclosure to anchor it. What matters more than the exact number is where it comes from, and on that point the evidence is fairly clear.
Where did the money actually come from?
In my opinion, the overwhelming majority of Sykes's wealth was built not from trading penny stocks, but from selling the idea of trading penny stocks. The single most revealing data point is the Forbes contributor estimate that he made as much as $20 million from subscriptions in 2015 alone. Set that against the SEC Form D showing his hedge fund raised barely $257,000, and the picture resolves: the fortune is an information-marketing fortune. It comes from Trading Challenge enrollments, subscription products, books, and his stake in StocksToTrade — a recurring-revenue software business — not from a verified trading account quietly compounding in the background.
Why this matters for prospective students
This is the crux of the entire review. If a "trading guru" makes his money primarily by teaching rather than by trading, then your tuition is not buying you a seat next to a master practitioner — it is buying you a spot in his revenue model. His incentive is to sell you the next tier, not to make you independently profitable, because a student who succeeds and leaves is worth far less than one who keeps buying. In my opinion, that misalignment is the real reason to be cautious, and it is the single biggest difference between Sykes's model and how I believe a trading educator should actually operate.
A Better Way: The "Financed Bull" Strategy
I'll be direct about my bias: I run a competing education business, so of course I think my approach is better. But I don't ask you to take that on faith — I ask you to do to me exactly what I've asked you to do to Sykes: demand verifiable proof. Mine is published openly at my verified results page, with real E*TRADE statements.
The philosophy I teach is the opposite of chasing illiquid penny stocks. Instead of gambling on micro-caps that can be manipulated, I focus on selling options premium on high-quality, liquid companies — collecting income with defined risk and always carrying downside protection. The goal is consistent, hedged income on names worth owning, not lottery tickets on stocks that trade for pennies.
What to Look for | Tim Sykes' model | The Financed Bull approach |
|---|---|---|
Verified track record | Self-reported on a platform he owns | |
What you actually trade | Illiquid, low-float penny stocks | High-quality, liquid large-cap companies |
Risk management | Allegedly trapped in his own penny-stock blowups | Hedging and defined risk on positions |
Verification | "Compilation," self-imported entries | Independently issued brokerage statements, published openly |
Price for the core program | Reportedly $12,000–$16,000 | 14-day trial at $279 |
Ready to See Verified Trades and Disciplined Risk Management? Join the 127+ five-star verified members already following the Financed Bull Strategy.
Discover the Best Trading Strategy to Dominate the Market
- Earn consistent profits in ALL markets (including market crashes)
- Step-by-step education course reveals everything you need and caters to ALL traders (absolute beginners through advanced traders)
- It's the only course you'll ever need!
Conclusion: My Tim Sykes Review
After working through the documents, the filings, the lawsuits, and his own recorded words, here is where I land, stated as my opinion. Tim Sykes is the original template for the modern trading guru, and the case study every prospective student should learn from first. The founding story has never been independently proven. The one time real investors got to scrutinize him, through the Cilantro hedge fund, the SEC filing shows he could attract only a quarter-million dollars and four investors. He has called himself a poor investor on the record. His "verification" lives on a platform he owns, and a sales rep misrepresented it to me on a recorded call. The wealth, by all available evidence, was built by selling the dream rather than living it.
None of that requires you to believe I am right about everything. It requires only that you apply a single consistent standard to anyone — Sykes, me, or anyone else — who asks for your money: show me the independent, audited proof. Sykes, in twenty years, has not. Among the educators I've reviewed, the two I consider the most problematic are Invest with Corey and Felix Prehn; Sykes belongs in that conversation as the one who wrote the playbook the others now run.
Looking for a Legitimate Options Trading Education?
If you're researching trading educators because you've been burned — or want to avoid being burned — here's what actually works.
I'm a former Wall Street investment banker. I interned at Morgan Stanley, then worked at CIBC World Markets and Petsky Prunier. I generate verified +78% and +67% returns on real E*TRADE accounts, fully documented on my verified results page.
The strategy that actually works isn't day trading penny stocks, buying expensive courses from people without verified records, or following trading "gurus" whose numbers live on their own websites. It's selling options premium for consistent monthly income on high-quality stocks.
Read my guide to Selling Options Premium for Consistent Income — or join the 127+ verified five-star reviewers who follow my real-time trade alerts.
Consumer Resources & Protection
If you believe you've been misled or financially harmed by any trading educator, you have real options. These agencies exist to take your report:
- Federal Trade Commission (FTC) — report deceptive or unfair business practices: reportfraud.ftc.gov
- Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) — report securities fraud or misleading investment claims: sec.gov/submit-tip-or-complaint
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) — report fraud involving commodities, futures, or related schemes: cftc.gov/complaint
- FINRA — file a complaint about brokerage or investment-related conduct: finra.org/investors/need-help/file-a-complaint
- FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) — report online financial fraud: ic3.gov
- Your State Attorney General — find and file with your state's office: naag.org/find-my-ag
- Better Business Bureau (BBB) — file a complaint about a business: bbb.org/file-a-complaint
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) — report financial-product complaints: consumerfinance.gov/complaint
Get the Complete Framework — Free Get $400+ of free options trading training and the Trader's Edge cheat sheet. Win up to 98% of your trades in 10 minutes a day. Join 127+ five-star verified reviewers. No credit card required.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Tim Sykes a scam?
In my opinion, calling him an outright "scam" is too simple — he is a real person with a real, long public career who genuinely teaches a strategy. The more accurate and more useful framing is that his marketed track record has never been independently verified, his "proof" lives on a platform he owns, and his business makes its money by selling education rather than by trading. Whether that makes him worth $12,000+ of your money is a judgment I'd urge you to make with healthy skepticism.
Did Tim Sykes really turn $12,000 into over $1 million?
He has claimed this for roughly twenty years, and news outlets have repeated the claim, but I have never found a single audited, independent brokerage statement that documents it. In my opinion, an unproven claim repeated for two decades does not become true through repetition.
What is Tim Sykes' net worth?
Estimates commonly range from $20 million to $50 million, though that is an estimate, not a verified figure. The important point is the source: the evidence — including a Forbes contributor estimate of up to $20 million from subscriptions in 2015 alone — indicates the wealth came from selling courses, subscriptions, and software, not from a verified trading record.
What happened to Tim Sykes' hedge fund?
His fund, Cilantro Fund Partners, filed an SEC Form D in 2003 showing it raised only $257,284 from four investors against a $100 million offering. By news accounts, the fund later collapsed in part because it got trapped in an illiquid penny stock. Sykes told Reuters in 2007 that he is "not a very good investor."
Is Profit.ly real verification of his trades?
No, in my opinion. Profit.ly is a platform Sykes owns. Entries are self-imported and can be edited or deleted, and the "verified" badge applies to self-reported data rather than to an independent audit of brokerage records. I consider "it's verified on Profit.ly" to be misleading.
How much does Tim Sykes' Trading Challenge cost?
Recent accounts, including Reddit threads, describe quotes in the $12,000–$16,000 range for the flagship Trading Challenge. Complaints suggest much of the deliverable is a large library of pre-recorded video with limited direct personal access.
Has Tim Sykes been sued?
Yes. StocksToTrade-related entities and Sykes were named in a 2020 federal trade-secrets lawsuit (Scanz Technologies v. JewMon, SDFL), which settled in 2021. A separate 2025 federal class action (Moses v. Millionaire Media) alleged TCPA marketing violations and also settled. Settlements are not admissions of liability, but the pattern is worth noting.
Are Tim Sykes' "millionaire students" real?
Some students may genuinely have profited, but their headline results are self-reported, with no published independent brokerage statements that I've found. Several of his best-known early students went on to build their own separate brands.
Is penny-stock trading a good strategy for beginners?
In my opinion, no. Low-float penny stocks are illiquid and easily manipulated, which makes them among the riskiest instruments a beginner can touch. I prefer selling options premium on high-quality, liquid companies with defined risk and downside protection.
What's a more credible alternative to Tim Sykes?
I'd start with one rule: only trust an educator who publishes independent, verifiable proof. My own E*TRADE statements are published openly on my verified results page, showing +78% and +67% verified returns, and you can start with $400+ of free training before paying anything.
How can I verify any trading guru's claims myself?
Ask for independently issued brokerage statements — not screenshots, not a self-owned "verification" website, and not a "compilation." Real verification means a third party examined actual broker records. If an educator can't or won't provide that, treat the track record as unproven.
Does David Jaffee have verified results?
Yes. I publish real E*TRADE statements on my results page, documenting +78% and +67% returns over the trailing twelve months, plus prior years including a transparent disclosure of a weaker transition year. I hold myself to the same standard I'm asking you to hold Tim Sykes to.
Disclaimer: This article reflects my personal opinions and analysis based on publicly available documents, court filings, news reports, and my own investigation. Statements characterizing Tim Sykes's business or conduct are my opinion. Allegations described as such are unproven allegations made by third parties, and settlements referenced are not admissions of liability. Nothing here is investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own research and consult a qualified professional before making financial decisions.